As you probably know, the Senate is debating the merits of an amendment to ban gay marriage. I find this to be utterly ridiculous and here's why.
First of all, sexual orientation is not a choice. I didn't choose to be heterosexual any more than a gay person chooses to be homosexual. It may be a lifestyle that you disagree with, but making it illegal won't stop it. All people deserve equality. Plain and simple. Making gay marriage illegal won't mean that there won't be gay people anymore. They'll still fall in love, date, live together, raise children and so forth. An amendment to prevent rights to certain groups of people is a dangerous precedent to set.
Look, I don't drink. But it's not my goal to prevent everyone from drinking just because I don't. Prohibition didn't work at stopping people from consuming alcohol and banning gay marriage won't stop gay people from being together. If you don't like it, don't do it.
Those who point to the Bible and say that it's wrong are justified in doing so, if that's what they believe. But all that should mean is that THEIR church of THEIR denomination doesn't perform gay marriages. The church I go to believes in and performs gay marriages, which is one of the reasons we attend services there. As we (theoretically) live in a country that has a separation between church and state, the government shouldn't be using religious reasons to deny gays (or bisexuals or transgendered for that matter) the right to marry. Marriage licenses are issued by the state, not the church.
Those who think that it will negatively impact the sanctity of marriage need to realize that marriage has very little sanctity left, due to how ridiculously easy it is to get married and get divorced. If you want to increase the chances of successful marriage, get involved with pre-marital counseling in your area. My parents did this for four years, counseling couples before they would get married to make sure they knew what they were getting into and to think about the different challenges it will present. Marie and I went through it as well and we both found it to be beneficial. Marriage is not "dating+", it's a commitment to another person, through thick and thin, forever. FOREVER. And there's nothing to say that two people of the same sex can't have that level of commitment to each other - they've never even been given the chance.
Besides, I find the idea of a man and a ferret getting married to be adorable.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 11:31 am (UTC)It's a hard place to be, too. I'm absolutely for committed homosexual couples having benefits, the same as heterosexual families. And I'm happy that more and more companies are offering those to same-sex relationships.
This is making no sense, is it? I'm going to stop now. :-D
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 12:06 pm (UTC)It sounds harsher than I mean it to. I just hate the state of relationships nowadays. People no longer work at them. And I think they're one of the most beautiful things we can work toward - a harmonious union. All of my gay friends stay committed for what they call "a hot minute" - which means until a better looking boy/girl asks for oral treatment in the bathroom at the club. It disheartens me to hear about incidents like that every 5 minutes.
Do you hate me? I'm pro-choice. Does that restore any measure of affection for me as a person? :-D
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 12:15 pm (UTC)And I'd much rather have people who visit here with opposing viewpoints than preaching to the choir each time. I'm more than willing to admit when I'm not right (eek!) and think that we all exist in the search for truth. It's our duty to help others find truth via dialogue and experiences.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 12:39 pm (UTC)My family is from Texas. And southern Baptist/Assemblies of God. Know how fun that is? ;-) I'd say I'm doing well to not have turned out like them.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 01:00 pm (UTC)As long as you're thinking for yourself, it's all good.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 01:02 pm (UTC)That just sounds like all your friends are immature and don't know what they want. Or maybe they DO know what they want ... some people are just like that.
But that's not an inherently gay trait.
It's an inherently human trait.
I agree with you 100% that people don't seem to really work at relationships anymore. Everything is so much more out in the open.
But, again, this has nothing to do with gay/straight.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 02:15 pm (UTC)I suppose I don't know how to fully express my stance on this matter. I know what I mean, I just can't properly say what I mean.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-23 03:32 pm (UTC)I sometimes wonder if stuff like this is due to the fact that gays don't always have a lot of acceptance in society. I think they're constantly bearing the implication that you chose to be this way and should "be straight". Since they know this isn't a choice and can't conform, I think they're kind of bumbling and trying to make their own sort of rules. Does that make sense?
no subject
Date: 2004-06-24 04:39 am (UTC)But, I think that's just heterosexism in action. If we weren't a homophobic culture, there could be a lot more stable gay relationships.
That being said, I know quite a few lesbians who have been together 10+ years.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-24 06:05 am (UTC)I think all too often people, as silly as it sounds, believe the stereotypes of television until they learn otherwise, if they ever do. So if you grow up believing that gay people are a certain way without ever having met one, it's like homophobia is almost inevitable.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-24 06:27 am (UTC)There are a ton of things that I only know about from watching TV. E.g. police investigations, dead bodies, what a car exploding looks like, what gunfire looks like, how a trial goes, etc. I think that's a very valid argument.
I went through a phase where I thought it was really normal for women to keep a shirt on during sex. I wondered if I was being odd by not doing that. Then I realized that only women on TV or in the movies do that because they don't want the world to see their breastests.
I was president of the gay club at my college.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-24 07:32 am (UTC)But then again, I'm still pissed that we don't have personal jetpacks yet.
And *I* want to see their breastests!